All Issue

2025 Vol.31, Issue 3 Preview Page
Analysis of Semantic Network and Critical Discourse on Energy-Related Contents of World Geography Textbooks

세계지리 교과서의 에너지 관련 내용에 대한 언어네트워크와 비판적 담론 분석

이윤미1 · 조철기2

Lee, Yunmi1 · Cho, Chul-Ki2

1제1저자, 경북대학교 사범대학 지리교육과 강사/중등교육연구소 연구원
2교신저자, 경북대학교 사범대학 지리교육과 교수
1First Author, Lecturer, Department of Geography Education, Teachers College, Kyungpook National University / Researcher, Secondary Education Research Institute attached to Teachers College of Kyungpook National University
2Corresponding Author, Professor, Department of Geography Education, Kyungpook National University
31 August 2025. pp. 511-536
PDF Citation
Abstract
This study argues what energy-related texts in world geography textbooks look like through semantic network and critical discourse analysis from the perspective of energy transition and energy citizenship, including education for sustainable development (ESD), and what their implications and limitations are. Energy-related texts in world geography textbooks assume energy as a resource and are biased around the distribution, movement, production, and consumption of energy resources. Therefore, energy-related texts in world geography textbooks fail to illuminate energy issues from the perspective of climate change and Anthropocene, which have recently emerged as important, and thus determine the limitations that do not reach the practice of energy justice and active energy citizenship for sustainable development and the future. Based on these confirmed energy discourses, it is argued that geography education through energy should develop into energy justice and the practice and action of energy citizenship in order to conform to education for sustainable development.
Keywords
semantic network analysis
critical discourse analysis
energy
resource
climate change
energy citizenship
이 연구는 세계지리 교과서의 에너지관련 텍스트들이 어떤 양상을 보이는지를 지속가능발전 교육을 포함하여, 에너지 전환과 에너지 시민성의 관점에서 의미연결망과 비판적 담론 분석을 통해 규명하고, 그 함의와 한계는 무엇인지를 논의한다. 세계지리 교과서의 에너지관련 텍스트는 에너지를 하나의 자원으로 상정하고, 에너지 자원의 분포와 이동, 생산 및 소비 지역을 중심으로 편향되게 기술되어 있다. 따라서 세계지리 교과서의 에너지관련 텍스트들은 최근 중요하게 떠오르는 기후변화와 인류세의 관점에서 에너지 쟁점을 조명하는데 실패하고, 그리하여 지속가능한 발전 및 미래를 위한 에너지 정의와 능동적인 에너지 시민성의 실천에는 이르지 못하는 한계를 노정한다. 이와같이 확인된 에너지 담론들에 근거하여, 에너지를 통한 지리교육이 지속가능발전 교육에 부합하기 위해 ‘에너지 자원에 대한 인식’을 넘어 ‘에너지 정의와 에너지 시민성의 실천과 행동’으로 발전되어야 한다는 것을 주장한다.
키워드
언어네트워크 분석
비판적 담론 분석
에너지
자원
기후변화
에너지 시민성
References
  1. 강운선, 2016, 다문화교육정책의 목표에 관한 연결망 분석, 한국사회교과교육학회 연차학술대회 발표자료집, 383-388.
  2. 고수정·김순양, 2013, 복지행정분야 연구논문의 경향 분석: Network Text Analysis를 중심으로, 한국사회와 행정연구, 24(2), 211-234.
  3. 교육부, 2015, 사회과 교육과정, 교육부 고시 제2015-74호[별책7], 교육부.
  4. ______, 2022, 사회과 교육과정, 교육부 고시 제2022-33호[별책7], 교육부.
  5. 권영락·이미숙·김혜숙·유은정·김찬국, 2021, 지속가능발전 교육을 위한 국가·사회적 요구 조사, 한국교육과정평가원.
  6. 김고운, 2013, 한·중·일 교과서 속 에너지 관련 내용에 대한 비판적 담론분석, 서울대학교 환경대학원석사학위논문.
  7. 김용학, 2005, 사회연결망분석(제3판), 서울: 박영사.
  8. 남궁승태·류상일, 2011, 재난안전 관련 법제 분석, 국가위기관리학회 학술대회, 391-394.
  9. 박성희, 2009, 제17대 대통령 후보 합동 토론 언어네트워크 분석: 북한 관련 이슈를 중심으로, 한국언론정보학보, 45(1), 220-254.
  10. 박진희, 2014, 에너지 시민성과 재생가능에너지, 한국환경사회학회 학술대회 자료집, 39-55.
  11. 박치성·정지원, 2013, 텍스트 네트워크 분석: 사회적 인식 네트워크(socio-cognitive network) 분석을 통한 정책이해관계자 간 공유된 의미 파악 사례, 한국행정학회 하계학술발표논문집, 828-849.
  12. 박한우·Loet, Leydesdorff, 2004, 한국어의 내용분석을 위한 KrKwic 프로그램의 이해와 적용: Daum. net에서 제공된 지역혁신에 관한 뉴스를 대상으로, Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 6(5), 1377-1387.
  13. 성열관, 2010, 세계시민교육 교육과정의 보편적 핵심 요소와 한국적 특수성에 대한 고찰, 한국교육, 37(2), 109-130.
  14. 이동민, 2014, 초등지리 교육과정에 반영된 세계시민교육 관련 요소의 구조적 특성에 관한 연구: 2009 개정 교육과정 성취기준에 대한 내용분석을 중심으로, 대한지리학회지, 49(6), 949-969.
  15. 이동민·고아라, 2015, 중등 지리 교육과정에 반영된 세계시민교육 관련 요소의 구조적 특성에 관한 연구: 2009 개정 교육과정 성취기준에 대한 내용분석을 중심으로, 사회과교육, 54(3), 1-19.
  16. 이수상, 2014, 언어네트워크 분석 방법을 활용한 학술논문의 내용분석, 정보관리학회지, 31(4), 49-68.10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.4.049
  17. 조미성·윤순진, 2016, 에너지전환운동 과정에서의 생태시민성 학습: 서울시 관악구 에너지자립마을에 대한 질적 사례 연구를 바탕으로, 공간과사회, 26(4), 190-228.
  18. 조철기, 2016, 사회적 자연의 지리환경교육적 함의, 한국지역지리학회지, 22(4), 912-930.
  19. ______, 2022, 에너지 시민성과 에너지 정의를 위한 지리교육, 한국지역지리학회지, 28(1), 99-117. 10.26863/JKARG.2022.2.28.1.99
  20. 하은혜·이채현·조철기, 2022, 언어네트워크 분석 기법을 활용한 중등학교 지리 교과서의 지리정보체계(GIS) 내용 분석, 한국지역지리학회지, 28(3), 367-381.10.26863/JKARG.2022.8.28.3.367
  21. 현명주, 2014, 에너지 시민성 개념에 대한 고찰, 한국환경교육학회 학술대회 자료집, 15-20.
  22. 홍덕화·이영희, 2014, 한국의 에너지 운동과 에너지 시티즌십-유형과 특징, ECO, 18(1), 7-44.
  23. Apple, M.W., 1996, Cultural politics and education, New York: Teachers College Press.
  24. Berkes, F., Colding, J., and Folke, C., 2000, Rediscovery of Traditional Ecological Knowledge as Adaptive Management, Ecological Applications, 10(5), 1251-1262. 10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1251:ROTEKA]2.0.CO;2
  25. Blewitt, J., 2008, Understanding Sustainable Development, London and Sterling, VA: Earthscan Publications.
  26. Bull, R., Petts, J., and Evans, J., 2008, Social learning from public engagement: Dreaming the impossible?, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 51(5), 701-716.10.1080/09640560802208140
  27. Chambers, J.M., 2009, Critical discourse analysis: a research methodology for the analysis of environmental education materials, in Zandvliet, D.B. (ed.), Diversity in Environmental Education Research, Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers, 131-146. 10.1163/9789087908614_009
  28. Clover, D., 2002, Traversing the gap: Concientizacióon, educative-activism in environmental adult education, Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 315-323.10.1080/13504620220145465
  29. Crick, B., 1999, The Presuppositions of Citizenship Education, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 33(3), 337-352.10.1111/1467-9752.00141
  30. Defila, R., Di Giulio, A., and Ruesch Schweizer, C., 2018, Two souls are dwelling in my breast: Uncovering how individuals in their dual role as consumer-citizen perceive future energy policies, Energy Research & Social Science, 35, 152-162.10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.021
  31. Devine-Wright, P., 2007, Energy citizenship: Psychological aspects of evolution in sustainable energy technologies, in Murphy, J. (ed.), Governing Technology for Sustainability, London: Earthscan.
  32. Dobson, A., 2003, Citizenship and the Environment, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199258449.001.0001
  33. ______, 2006, Citizenship, environment, economy(Vol. 14), NY: Psychology Press.
  34. Dryzek, J.S., 1997, The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses, New York: Oxford University Press.
  35. Eckersley, R., 2004, The Green State: Rethinking Democracy and Sovereignty, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/3364.001.0001
  36. Esteva, G., 1992, Development. In W. Sachs (Ed.), The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power, London: Zed Books.
  37. Fairclough, N., 1985, Critical and descriptive goals in discourse analysis, Journal of pragmatics, 9(6), 739-763.10.1016/0378-2166(85)90002-5
  38. ______, 1989, Language and Power, Harlow: Longman
  39. ______, 1992, Discourse and text: linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis, Discourse & Society, 3(2), 193-217. 10.1177/0957926592003002004
  40. ______, 1995, Media Discourse, London: Edward Arnold.
  41. Fast, S., 2013, Social acceptance of renewable energy: Trends, concepts, and geographies, Geography Compass, 7, 853-866.10.1111/gec3.12086
  42. Firth, R. and Winter, C., 2007, Constructing education for sustainable development: The secondary school geography curriculum and initial teacher training, Environmental Education Research, 13(5), 599-619.10.1080/13504620701659079
  43. Gough, S. and Scott, W., 2006, Promoting environmental citizenship through learning: towards a theory of change, in Dobson, A. (ed.), Environmental Citizenship: Getting from Here to There, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  44. Hasanov, M. and Zuidema, C., 2018, The transformative power of self-organization: Towards a conceptual framework for understanding local energy initiatives in The Netherlands, Energy Research & Social Science, 37, 85-93.10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.038
  45. Hyland, K. and Paltridge, B., 2011, Continuum Companion to Discourse Analysis, London NY: Continuum International Publishing Group.
  46. IPCC(Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 2007, Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511546013
  47. Janks, H., 1997, Critical discourse analysis as a research tool, Discourse: Studies in the Sultural Politics of Education, 18(3), 329-342. 10.1080/0159630970180302
  48. Kandpal, T.C. and Garg, H. P., 1999, Energy education, Applied Energy, 64(1-4), 71-78. 10.1016/S0306-2619(99)00076-8
  49. Lemke, J.L., 1995, Textual Politics : Discourse and Social Dynamics, London; Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.
  50. Lennon, B., Dunphy, N.P.P., and Sanvicente, E., 2019, Community acceptability and the energy transition: A citizens’ perspective, Energy, Sustainability and Society, 9(35), 1-18.10.1186/s13705-019-0218-z
  51. Lovins, A.B., 1976, Soft Energy Paths: Towards a Durable Peace, NY: Harper & Row.
  52. Luke, A., 1999, Critical discourse analysis, Issues in educational research, 161-173.10.1016/B978-008043349-3/50016-5
  53. Moon, T., 2010, Green Growth Policy in the Republic of Korea: Its Promise and Pitfalls, Korean Observer, 41(3), 379-414.
  54. Morrow, R.A. and Torres, C.A., 1995, Social Theory and Education: A Sritique of Theories of Social and Cultural Reproduction, NY: SUNY Press.
  55. Mullally, G., Dunphy, N., and O’Connor, P., 2018, Participative environmental policy integration in the Irish energy sector, Environmental Science and Policy, 83, 71-78.10.1016/j.envsci.2018.02.007
  56. Odum, H.T., 2007, Environment, Power, and Society for the Twenty-first Century: The Hierarchy of Energy, New York Chichester, West Sussex: Columbia University Press.
  57. Ottinger, G., 2017, Making sense of citizen science: stories as a hermeneutic resource, Energy Research & Social Science, 31, 41-49.10.1016/j.erss.2017.06.014
  58. Pachauri, R. and Reisinger, A., 2007, Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report, Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland.
  59. Pingel, F., 2010, UNESCO Guidebook on Texbook Research and Textbook Revision (2nd revised and updated edition ed.), Paris Braunschweig: UNESCO.
  60. Radtke, J., 2014, A closer look inside collaborative action: Civic engagement and participation in community energy initiatives, People, Place and Policy, 8(3), 235-248.10.3351/ppp.0008.0003.0008
  61. Ratner, B.D., 2004, Sustainability as a Dialogue of Values: Challenges to the Sociology of Development, Sociological Inquiry, 74(1), 50-69. 10.1111/j.1475-682X.2004.00079.x
  62. Ryghaug, M., Skjølsvold, T.M., and Heidenreich, S., 2018, Creating energy citizenship through material participation, Social Studies of Science, 48(2), 283-303.10.1177/030631271877028629648504PMC5977452
  63. Stemler, S., 2000, An overview of content analysis, Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 7(1), 17.
  64. Szulecki, K., 2018, Conceptualizing Energy Democracy, Environmental Politics, 27(1), 21-4110.1080/09644016.2017.1387294.
  65. Torgerson, D., 1999, The Promise of Green Politics: Environmentalism and the Public Sphere, NC: Duke University Press Books.
  66. Tow, W.T., 2007, Strategic Dimensions of Energy Competition in Asia, Energy Security in Asia, 161-174.
  67. UNESCO, 2004, United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development 2005-2014: Draft International Implementation Scheme, Paris: UNESCO.
  68. ______, 2005, United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development 2005-2014: International Implementation Scheme, Paris: UNESCO.
  69. ______, 2011, The Hidden Crisis, Paris: UNESCO.
  70. Wals, A., 2009, United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (DESD 2005-2014): Review of Contexts and Structures for Education for Sustainable Development, Paris: UNESCO.
  71. White, L.A., 1943, Energy and the Evolution of Culture, American Anthropologist, 45(3), 335-356. 10.1525/aa.1943.45.3.02a00010
  72. World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987, Our common future, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  73. Wu, K. and Brown, J.G., and Siddiqi, T.A., 2007, The Asia-Pacific Energy Dilemma, in Wu, K. and Fesharaki, F. (eds.), Asia's Energy Future: Regional Dynamics and Global Implications, 1-16.
Information
  • Publisher :The Korean Association of Regional Geographers
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국지역지리학회
  • Journal Title :REGION AND GEOGRAPHY
  • Journal Title(Ko) :지역과 지리
  • Volume : 31
  • No :3
  • Pages :511-536
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.26863/JKARG.2025.8.31.3.511
Journal Informaiton REGION AND GEOGRAPHY REGION AND GEOGRAPHY
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close